Research and Impact

Community Research • Evidence • Impact • Gilgil, Kenya

Research Community Realities. Measure What Changes.

HEAL CREC places Community Research at the foundation of its work. We seek to understand the realities affecting young people, translate local evidence into appropriate interventions, measure what those interventions change and use the learning to strengthen programs, partnerships, advocacy, policy and public systems.

Research is not an activity we add after a program has been designed. It is how we determine what deserves to be done, for whom, why, with which resources and how success should ultimately be measured.
Our Research Philosophy

Evidence Before Intervention.

A well-intentioned intervention can still miss the real problem when it is based on assumptions. HEAL CREC therefore seeks to begin by listening to communities, collecting evidence, examining existing systems and identifying both barriers and opportunities.

Research should help determine whether the appropriate response is a new program, stronger access to an existing public opportunity, a referral pathway, technical capacity, institutional collaboration, advocacy or policy action.

01 Define the Reality

Understand what people are actually experiencing rather than beginning with assumptions.

02 Identify Root Causes

Examine the economic, social, psychological and institutional factors behind observed challenges.

03 Map Existing Resources

Determine what communities, government, institutions and other actors already provide.

04 Target the Missing Gap

Use evidence to decide where HEAL CREC and its partners can add meaningful value.

Flagship Research Agenda

Researching the Realities Shaping Youth Futures.

HEAL CREC’s research agenda concentrates on areas where economic opportunity, mental wellbeing, technology, public systems and governance intersect.

Economic Opportunity

Youth Unemployment & Economic Vulnerability

Employment barriers, underemployment, income insecurity, livelihood constraints and the wider consequences of prolonged economic exclusion.

Digital Opportunity

Digital Skills & Future-of-Work Readiness

Market-relevant digital capabilities, AI readiness, remote work, digital entrepreneurship and practical employability gaps.

Mental Health

Youth Mental Health & Psychosocial Wellbeing

Stressors, psychological distress, resilience, help-seeking behaviour, protective factors and access to appropriate support.

Substance Use

Substance-Use Risk & Support Pathways

Drivers of vulnerability, prevention, referral pathways, treatment access and supportive community environments.

Youth Transition

School-to-Work & Graduate Transitions

Understanding the skills, networks, information and support young people need between education and productive economic participation.

Public Infrastructure

Youth Empowerment Centres & Digital Infrastructure

Accessibility, functionality, programming, utilization and relevance of public youth empowerment resources.

Governance

Youth-Responsive Policy & Good Governance

How leadership, public programs, public participation and policy choices shape opportunity and wellbeing.

Program Effectiveness

What Actually Works for Young People?

Evaluating the relevance, accessibility and outcomes of youth-focused interventions and learning from implementation experience.

Signature Research Priority The Unemployment–Mental Health–Substance Use Nexus
Interconnected Youth Vulnerability

Understanding How One Challenge Can Reinforce Another.

HEAL CREC seeks to investigate the relationships between unemployment, prolonged economic insecurity, idleness, social pressure, mental distress and substance-use vulnerability among young people.

The research should also examine the protective factors capable of interrupting this cycle, including practical skills, economic opportunity, supportive social environments, mental-health services, mentorship and functioning public youth institutions.

Economic Factors Unemployment, income insecurity and livelihood barriers.
Psychological Factors Stress, hopelessness, distress and resilience.
Social Factors Idleness, social pressure, belonging and community environment.
Protective Factors Skills, opportunity, support systems and enabling institutions.
How Our Research Should Work

From Research Question to Useful Evidence.

Strong community research requires a disciplined process capable of producing evidence that communities, programs, partners and decision-makers can actually use.

Define the Question

Identify the community problem, evidence gap or decision the study needs to inform.

Design the Study

Determine appropriate participants, methods, tools, ethics and analysis requirements.

Engage the Community

Involve relevant people and stakeholders respectfully and transparently.

Collect Evidence

Gather relevant quantitative and qualitative information using appropriate methods.

Analyse

Identify patterns, relationships, needs, barriers, opportunities and limitations.

Interpret

Connect findings with community realities, existing systems and practical implications.

Communicate

Translate evidence into reports, briefs, recommendations and accessible community information.

Act & Learn

Use findings to guide programs and then measure whether the response produces meaningful change.

Research Methods

Use the Method That Best Answers the Question.

HEAL CREC’s research approach should remain methodologically flexible. Different questions require different forms of evidence, and many community challenges benefit from combining quantitative and qualitative methods.

Research design should reflect the purpose of the study, participant population, resources, ethical requirements and level of evidence required.

Community Surveys Structured information about needs, experiences, behaviours and access to opportunities.
Key Informant Interviews Insights from professionals, institutions, leaders and people with relevant community knowledge.
Focus Group Discussions Deeper understanding of shared experiences, perceptions and community priorities.
Community Needs Assessments Mapping priority problems, resources, barriers and potential intervention opportunities.
Program Monitoring Tracking activities, participation, implementation quality and progress.
Program Evaluation Assessing relevance, effectiveness, outcomes, learning and areas for improvement.
Case Studies Detailed examination of programs, communities, institutions or individual pathways.
Secondary Data Review Using credible existing information to strengthen context, interpretation and research design.
Responsible Research

Evidence Must Never Come at the Expense of People.

Research involving communities should protect dignity, privacy, safety and meaningful participation throughout the research process.

Informed Participation Participants should understand what they are being asked to take part in.
Privacy & Confidentiality Personal and sensitive information should be handled responsibly.
Data Protection Information should be collected, stored and accessed in a controlled manner.
Safeguarding Additional care is required when research involves vulnerable participants.
Research Integrity Findings should be reported accurately, including limitations and uncertainty.
Do No Harm Research procedures should minimize foreseeable harm or unnecessary risk.
Community Respect Local knowledge and lived experience should be treated with dignity.
Responsible Communication Findings should not be exaggerated or presented beyond what the evidence supports.
Our Impact Framework

Measure More Than Activities.

Counting workshops, participants or courses is useful, but it does not by itself demonstrate meaningful impact. HEAL CREC should distinguish what was done from what actually changed.

01

Inputs

Funding, people, expertise, facilities, technology and other resources invested.

02

Outputs

Research activities, participants, courses, referrals, mentorship and program delivery.

03

Outcomes

Changes in knowledge, capability, behaviour, access, wellbeing or opportunity.

04

Longer-Term Change

Sustainable improvements in youth opportunity, resilience, systems and policy where evidence supports it.

Program Measurement

Different Programs Require Different Evidence.

HEAL CREC’s monitoring and evaluation framework should match the intended outcomes of each program rather than rely on one generic measure of success.

R

Community Research

Participants Engaged Studies Completed Research Quality Evidence Generated Recommendations Knowledge Outputs
E

Digital Skills & Economic Empowerment

Course Participation Course Completion Demonstrated Skills Portfolios Created Professional Profiles Opportunity Activity Employment Outcomes Enterprise Outcomes
H

Mental Health & Wellbeing

Awareness Activities Knowledge Change Support Access Referrals Prevention Engagement Follow-Up Learning
A/L

Advocacy, Leadership & Governance

Policy Briefs Recommendations Stakeholder Engagements Public Participation Institutional Responses Program Learning
Research-Based Advocacy

Evidence Should Influence Better Decisions.

Research becomes more useful when findings are translated into language and formats that communities, program teams, development partners and decision-makers can understand and act upon.

HEAL CREC should therefore connect research with program improvement, stakeholder dialogue, advocacy and evidence-informed policy engagement.

01
Community Evidence Document experiences, needs, barriers and opportunities.
02
Research Findings Analyse evidence and identify practical implications.
03
Policy Analysis Examine how findings relate to programs, institutions and public policy.
04
Recommendations Develop realistic evidence-based proposals for action.
05
Stakeholder Dialogue Share evidence with relevant communities, institutions and decision-makers.
06
Learning & Follow-Up Track responses and continue strengthening the evidence base.
Research & Evidence Library

Make Evidence Useful Beyond One Project.

As HEAL CREC completes verified research and evaluation work, this page should become a gateway to an accessible public evidence library.

Research

Research Reports

Detailed reports presenting research questions, methodology, findings, limitations and recommendations.

Add Verified Publications
Community Evidence

Community Assessments

Needs assessments and local studies that identify priorities, assets, barriers and program opportunities.

Add When Completed
Policy

Policy Briefs

Concise translation of research evidence into implications and recommendations for relevant stakeholders.

Add Verified Briefs
Impact

Program Evaluations

Evidence on program implementation, outcomes, learning, limitations and opportunities for improvement.

Add After Evaluation
Learning

Case Studies

Detailed learning from particular programs, participant pathways, institutions or community contexts.

Publish With Verification
Data

Data & Insights

Responsible presentation of selected verified indicators, trends and research insights where appropriate.

Publish Verified Data Only
Evidence Integrity

We Should Never Manufacture Impact.

Donor confidence and community trust depend on accuracy. HEAL CREC should publish figures, research findings, testimonials and impact claims only when they can be supported by documented organizational records or validated research.

No Invented Beneficiary Numbers Reach figures should come from verified records.
No Fabricated Outcomes Employment, wellbeing or policy outcomes must be documented.
Report Limitations Research uncertainty and methodological limitations should remain visible.
Distinguish Outputs From Outcomes Participation does not automatically equal impact.
Use Approved Stories Testimonials and community stories require appropriate verification and consent.
Correct Errors Transparently Material inaccuracies should be corrected when identified.
Research Partnerships

Research With HEAL CREC.

HEAL CREC’s grassroots presence can support responsible research collaborations that connect local realities with technical expertise, funding, evaluation capacity and wider development learning.

Fund Community Research Support carefully defined studies addressing priority youth and community questions.
Co-Design Research Develop relevant research questions and methodologies with us.
Field Research Collaboration Collaborate on appropriate grassroots research and data collection.
Monitoring & Evaluation Strengthen program measurement, learning and accountability.
Academic Collaboration Explore responsible knowledge partnerships with researchers and institutions.
Technical Research Support Contribute methodology, analysis, technology or specialist expertise.
Policy Research Help translate local evidence into stronger policy analysis.
Evidence Dissemination Support accessible reports, briefs, learning forums and knowledge sharing.
Community Participation

Communities Are More Than Sources of Data.

Local experience is essential to understanding local realities. Where appropriate, communities should be engaged not only during data collection but also in identifying research priorities, interpreting findings and understanding the implications of the evidence.

Identify Priorities Community concerns help shape relevant research questions.
Participate Responsibly Research engagement should respect informed participation.
Interpret Findings Lived experience helps place research results in context.
Share Learning Findings should be made understandable to relevant communities.
Grassroots Research Presence

Based Where Community Realities Can Be Understood.

HEAL CREC’s presence in Gilgil Town provides a local point of connection for communities, research participants, institutions, development partners and stakeholders interested in evidence-led youth empowerment.

HEAL CREC CBO Community Research & Empowerment Centre
Imani Building, Office Unit G06
Opposite EastMatt Supermarket / ABSA Bank
Gilgil Town, Nakuru County, Kenya
Research First • Evidence Into Action

Help Turn Local Evidence Into Better Programs, Better Decisions and Lasting Opportunity.

Partner with HEAL CREC to investigate the realities affecting young people, build a stronger local evidence base, measure what interventions actually change and translate research into practical empowerment, institutional learning and evidence-informed public action.